The Green Traitors | Australia | Truthophobes:Cutting Down Evil

We have a traitor on our Political Stage and it comes in the colour of GREEN.

A traitor is not loyal to their, country, its culture and beliefs system. The scum of any nation and THE GREENS are Australian scum.

True words from Marcus Tullius Cicero "A Nation cannot survive treason from within".

THE GREENS do not represent the environment and other humanitarian concerns. The Greens are Communists. They parade as green but are red to the core

THE GREENS support the growth of the islamic Ideology that commits Crimes Against Humanity.

THE GREENS through Cultural Marxism undermine the Judeo-Christian values the west was founded on.

THE GREENS support the demise of Australia as a democratic nation as they promote the agenda of the Globalist elite. The Climate change political agenda is about a transfer of power from the West.

Please spread this page link exposing THE GREEN scum of Australian politics for their traitorous acts against this nation and the harm such actions will bring to future generations.

THE GREENS

THE AUSTRALIAN TRAITORS

Australians who believe this country is something special, and want it to stay that way, need to wake up to Greens. They might claim they’re an environmental party, but in practice, the Greens are against almost everything that Australians typically take for granted.

Here’s some of the policies they’ve advocated for:

Change Australia Day
Decriminalise drugs
Dump the flag
Give prisoners the vote
Impose a 50 per cent personal income tax rate
Scrap border protection policies
Ban coal
Offer free university education for refugees
Give 16-year-olds the vote
Reintroduce death duties.

Ihttp://www.thegreeningoflabor.com/mobile/index.html#p=1

THE GREEN SUPPORT FOR CULTURAL MARXISM

ISLAM

Sky News Australia

The number of asylum seekers resettled in Australia would rise from around 14,000 to 50,000 each year under a new plan by the Australian Greens. Sarah Hanson-Young has told Sky News under the proposed policy Australia "would be saving money and we would be saving lives”.

Click here to Listen to the the Biggest loser in Parliament - Sarah Hanson Young.

Our nation will not be built stronger by immigrants that won't assimilate and want to kill us you brain dead traitor.

The Greenslime, leftard logic - PREACH AND DEMAND TOLERANCE WHILE ATTACKING FREE SPEECH AND DISPLAYING INTOLERANCE!
WHY STILL so silent "SHY" ......did you celebrate #AustraliaDay today?
It seems the Greens STILL lead the way in the stupidity factor; not to mention working ever so hard, it would 'seem' against majority of the people. They conveniently, and purposefully 'appear' to push important matters aside such as ABUSE, CRIMES AND OPPRESSION AGAINST WOMEN IN ISLAM! Has 'SHY' or any of the Greens clan, (and NOT forgetting the likes of Turnbull and Shorten too,) ever actually taken the time to sit down with any ex moslems that have lived the nightmare and listened to what they have to say, or ever read islams supposed 'holy books'?
As usual the SILENCE remains, as they always have on those matters that SHOULD be spoken about.....they are never truthfully discussed, if at all!
But then again, if you are as braindead as some.......
People MUST EDUCATE POLITICIANS ABOUT ISLAM -

Learn More by Clicking on the Buttons Below

Greens leader invites hardline Islamic preacher who opposes tough anti-terror laws and supports Sharia law to the party's Ramadan dinner

Batteries: Another green scam

Viv Forbes American Thinker 29th March 2017

Every day some green energy promoter or a battery salesman tells us how green energy with battery backup will supply Australia’s future electricity needs.

A battery stores energy. Energy can be stored using lead-acid, nickel/cadmium, lithium, molten salt, pumped hydro, hydrogen, flywheels, compressed air, or some other smart gizmo. But not one battery produces new energy -- they simply store and discharge energy produced by other means. They all deliver less energy than they consume. Moreover, to manufacture, charge, use, and dispose of batteries consumes energy and resources.

The idea of producing reliable grid power from intermittent green energy backed up by batteries looks possible in green doodle-diagrams, but would be absurdly inefficient and expensive.

Solar works a six-hour day

Consider a solar panel which is rated to collect, say, 100 units of energy per day at full capacity, in full mid-day sunlight, with a clean panel, properly aligned to face the sun.

No solar energy arrives overnight and only minimal amounts arrive during the three hours after dawn or before dusk. That means that solar energy can only be collected for about six hours per day, providing it is not cloudy, raining, or snowing. No amount of research or regulation will change this -- the solar energy union only works a six-hour day and takes quite a few sickies. So instead of feeding 100 units of energy per day into the grid, at best, the panel supplies just 25 units.

Can the addition of batteries give us 24/7 power from solar?

To deliver 100 units of energy in 24 hours will require an extra 75 units of energy to be collected, stored, and delivered by the batteries every sunny day. This will require another three solar units devoted solely to recharging batteries in just six sunny hours.

Cloudy/wet days are what really expose the problems of solar plus batteries. (This is why isolated green power systems must have a diesel generator in the shed.)

To insure against, say, seven days of cloudy weather would require a solar/battery system capable of collecting and storing 700 units of energy while still delivering 100 units to consumers every day. However, if several consecutive weeks of sunny weather then occur, this bloated system is capable of delivering seven times more power than needed, causing power prices to plunge, driving reliable generators out of business and wasting the life of solar panels producing unwanted electricity.

Solar energy obviously does best in sunny equatorial deserts, but that is not where most people live. And the huge Desertec Solar Power Dream for the northern Sahara has failed.

The report card on wind energy is different, but equally depressing.

When Australia had reliable, predictable coal-gas-hydro power in every state, the need for heavy interstate transmission was minimal. But green power will require robust and costly interstate transmission facilities to send large amounts of power at short notice from sunny coal-rich Queensland to cloudy Victoria, windless South Australia or droughted Tasmania.

Playing Snakes and Ladders with Australia’s Electricity Supply.

We are told that wind/solar plus pumped water storage will provide adequate grid power. Unfortunately, those huge hydro-pumps need steady continuous power -- something not provided by intermittent green energy. So are politicians planning to install huge chemical batteries or diesel motors to steadily recharge the elevated water storages in order to get back less energy than was consumed by the pumps?

Both wind and solar are unpredictable, unreliable, intermittent, and weather-dependent energy sources. They require large collection areas with a cobweb of access roads and transmission lines. Their output can change suddenly and cannot be managed easily to meet demand fluctuations. They need flexible backup power able to swing in quickly to maintain stability and supply.

Gas provides the easiest back-up for green energy, but gas exploration is banned in many areas of NSW, SAust and the whole of gas-rich Victoria. Canny residents of the green states are now investing in diesel generators.

The Perfect Solar Battery

Mother Earth has already given us the perfect solar battery for long-term storage of energy: it is called “coal.” Solar power from sunlight is converted by photosynthesis into wood, and thence into coal for high-density long-term solar energy storage. The downside to this system is that it has tied up large quantities of carbon that is therefore unavailable to the natural world. The upside is that releasing the energy from coal also releases life-giving CO2 back into the biosphere, where it belongs.

Our growing energy crisis was caused by political interference -- Australian politicians have not learned last century’s lessons of central planning in the comrade societies.

Robert Gottliebsen, writing in The Australian, 21/3/2017 puts it succinctly:

“The looming crisis is much worse than I expected. Three state governments, Victoria, NSW and South Australia, have vandalised our total energy system. The Premiers of each state clearly had no idea what they were doing. . .”

He also wrote:

“My information from the best possible sources is that if Victoria’s Hazelwood power station is shut on April 2, there is a 75% chance of blackouts in NSW and Victoria next summer.”

The best solution would be to cease all government force-feeding of intermittent green energy, get politicians out of the energy business and allow the construction of any gas/coal/nuclear or hydro plants that stack up for energy companies, investors, and consumers. This will eliminate all the land-loss, materials, and labour involved in building, running and maintaining an unreliable, unpredictable, uneconomic, intermittent, and absurdly expensive solar/wind/battery/hydro/diesel monstrosity?”

Intermittent energy with batteries or backup should be used and paid for by those who find them useful. They should not be subsidised or forced onto power grids or reluctant consumers.

Society has better things to do with community cash than squandering it on massive green energy toys and battery baloney.

Every day some green energy promoter or a battery salesman tells us how green energy with battery backup will supply Australia’s future electricity needs.

A battery stores energy. Energy can be stored using lead-acid, nickel/cadmium, lithium, molten salt, pumped hydro, hydrogen, flywheels, compressed air, or some other smart gizmo. But not one battery produces new energy -- they simply store and discharge energy produced by other means. They all deliver less energy than they consume. Moreover, to manufacture, charge, use, and dispose of batteries consumes energy and resources.

The idea of producing reliable grid power from intermittent green energy backed up by batteries looks possible in green doodle-diagrams, but would be absurdly inefficient and expensive.

Solar works a six-hour day

Consider a solar panel which is rated to collect, say, 100 units of energy per day at full capacity, in full mid-day sunlight, with a clean panel, properly aligned to face the sun.

No solar energy arrives overnight and only minimal amounts arrive during the three hours after dawn or before dusk. That means that solar energy can only be collected for about six hours per day, providing it is not cloudy, raining, or snowing. No amount of research or regulation will change this -- the solar energy union only works a six-hour day and takes quite a few sickies. So instead of feeding 100 units of energy per day into the grid, at best, the panel supplies just 25 units.

Can the addition of batteries give us 24/7 power from solar?

To deliver 100 units of energy in 24 hours will require an extra 75 units of energy to be collected, stored, and delivered by the batteries every sunny day. This will require another three solar units devoted solely to recharging batteries in just six sunny hours.

Cloudy/wet days are what really expose the problems of solar plus batteries. (This is why isolated green power systems must have a diesel generator in the shed.)

To insure against, say, seven days of cloudy weather would require a solar/battery system capable of collecting and storing 700 units of energy while still delivering 100 units to consumers every day. However, if several consecutive weeks of sunny weather then occur, this bloated system is capable of delivering seven times more power than needed, causing power prices to plunge, driving reliable generators out of business and wasting the life of solar panels producing unwanted electricity.

Solar energy obviously does best in sunny equatorial deserts, but that is not where most people live. And the huge Desertec Solar Power Dream for the northern Sahara has failed.

The report card on wind energy is different, but equally depressing.

When Australia had reliable, predictable coal-gas-hydro power in every state, the need for heavy interstate transmission was minimal. But green power will require robust and costly interstate transmission facilities to send large amounts of power at short notice from sunny coal-rich Queensland to cloudy Victoria, windless South Australia or droughted Tasmania.

Playing Snakes and Ladders with Australia’s Electricity Supply.

We are told that wind/solar plus pumped water storage will provide adequate grid power. Unfortunately, those huge hydro-pumps need steady continuous power -- something not provided by intermittent green energy. So are politicians planning to install huge chemical batteries or diesel motors to steadily recharge the elevated water storages in order to get back less energy than was consumed by the pumps?

Both wind and solar are unpredictable, unreliable, intermittent, and weather-dependent energy sources. They require large collection areas with a cobweb of access roads and transmission lines. Their output can change suddenly and cannot be managed easily to meet demand fluctuations. They need flexible backup power able to swing in quickly to maintain stability and supply.

Gas provides the easiest back-up for green energy, but gas exploration is banned in many areas of NSW, SAust and the whole of gas-rich Victoria. Canny residents of the green states are now investing in diesel generators.

The Perfect Solar Battery

Mother Earth has already given us the perfect solar battery for long-term storage of energy: it is called “coal.” Solar power from sunlight is converted by photosynthesis into wood, and thence into coal for high-density long-term solar energy storage. The downside to this system is that it has tied up large quantities of carbon that is therefore unavailable to the natural world. The upside is that releasing the energy from coal also releases life-giving CO2 back into the biosphere, where it belongs.

Our growing energy crisis was caused by political interference -- Australian politicians have not learned last century’s lessons of central planning in the comrade societies.

Robert Gottliebsen, writing in The Australian, 21/3/2017 puts it succinctly:

“The looming crisis is much worse than I expected. Three state governments, Victoria, NSW and South Australia, have vandalised our total energy system. The Premiers of each state clearly had no idea what they were doing. . .”

He also wrote:

“My information from the best possible sources is that if Victoria’s Hazelwood power station is shut on April 2, there is a 75% chance of blackouts in NSW and Victoria next summer.”

The best solution would be to cease all government force-feeding of intermittent green energy, get politicians out of the energy business and allow the construction of any gas/coal/nuclear or hydro plants that stack up for energy companies, investors, and consumers. This will eliminate all the land-loss, materials, and labour involved in building, running and maintaining an unreliable, unpredictable, uneconomic, intermittent, and absurdly expensive solar/wind/battery/hydro/diesel monstrosity?”

Intermittent energy with batteries or backup should be used and paid for by those who find them useful. They should not be subsidised or forced onto power grids or reluctant consumers.

Society has better things to do with community cash than squandering it on massive green energy toys and battery baloney.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/03/batteries_another_green_scam.html#ixzz4cwkLvASc